Tableside Politics

How could he not know what Jeremiah Wright believed after attending Trinity for twenty years? After two press confrences and much explaining, this question more than any seems to have dogged Sen. Obama as he tries to move forward in his quest to clinch the Democratic Nomination. Members of the church have been relatively silent, few coming forward to contradict or reenforce the image that has been painted of Wright by the media, Obama and Rev. Wright himself. Through this entire controversy there have been the YouTube clips of a few sermons after 9/11, the Moyers interview and the infamous Press Club/NAACP speeches, all and all a limited scope of reference to a thirty year career. Combined with these facts and using Obama's own history, speeches and books, there seems to be a disconnect between these two men and leads to a question I have yet to see explored by those who believe their relationship should raise questions in the minds of the electorate: Who is Jeremiah Wright?
In an age of google and mass information why has the media not delved deeper into Rev. Wright's past to see if the Post 9/11 Wright is in sync with the Pre 9/11 one? Have most of his sermons over the past thirty years, more importantly during the duration of Obama's attendence to Trinity, been this contradictory to Barack Obama's ideology? The answer is likely they have looked and there was little there. And if the media has failed to do so it is hard to imagine in such a tight race with so much at stake a political operative hasn't been deep in transcripts looking for more fuel to add to the Wright fire. If it is true there is not a history in Wright's past consistent with the Wright America has come to know then the answer to who is Jeremiah Wright becomes clearer and supports Barack Obama's statements that the Jeremiah Wright we know is not the one who brought him to Christ.
Barack Obama represents a generational shift, a realization of what the Civil Rights movement fought for with blood. While supporters of Barack Obama are clebrating the candidates ability to transcend race and class, there are those who are a product of their time and who for them change is not so easy to digest. No, this is not white america, some of who might never vote for a black man (or woman for that matter), but those who fought the fight to get Barack Obama where he is now. They are trapped in an inability to adapt to the reality of the times, stuck in a time where the fight for racial equality was fought on a different field with different rules. Jeremiah Wright is the prime example of how many people from different movements and backgrounds often self destruct when faced with a changing world. They are fighting enemies who are either gone or changed radically.
9/11 was the turning point for Jeremiah Wright, a point in time when two worlds collided and he veered off the road he helped to build. Instead of seeing the world through a modern lense, he saw it as a black man who came of age in a time when the government helped ensure his life would not be easy. He, like so many, lost a chance to unite the country in a positive way instead of through fear and a world view in need of a new Cold War. It was during this time Barack Obama's political career was heating up and his church attendence decreased, a fact pointed out by Wright himself and avoided by the Obama campaign due to the questions some have over whether Obama is actually a muslim. Wright proved further he is a man without a cause during his last outing, making comments and speaking in a sarcastic way at a time when he could undermine what many of his generation could never have imagined- a black president. It was important for him to feel relevant and find a stage than seek refuge in a life's work which Barack Obama was shaped by. As often happens when a man (or woman) resists change, it becomes about the man himself and to hell with the consequences.
Books could, and most certainly will be, written about who is Jeremiah Wright and what this controversy means in the larger scheme of things. And while who he is cannot be defined in a short article, there is no denying he is human, one who is lost and might take with him a man and a dream he and so many have fought hard to see become a reality. In the end it might be Jeremiah Wright's greatest sin.
Thank you for your reasoned
Posted: Fri, 05/02/2008 - 01:25.
Thank you for your reasoned argument about Jeremiah.
I'd like to point out a phenomenon, though.
I have some black friends who are professional and intelligent. They have seen through the lies and foolishness of this Administration and are well versed on a multitude of issues. However, there is one part of their lives that they are unable to turn their high-powered microscopes onto: their own deeply held paranoid conspiracy theories. Yes, it takes a mind of intense skepticism and objectivity to disbelieve the very things that make us the heroes we'd like to be, championing a zealously-held, but oft-discounted utter "truth". Jeremiah could not do that -- his egoism overwhelmed both Christianity morality and allowed him to sink into self-pity and pride. The difference between my friends who hold these beliefs privately and Jeremiah Wright is that Jeremiah is in a position of great power and responsibility, to his ministry and to his own integrity as a leader. It is telling that he chose this platform to allow the vast majority of Americans to turn their microscopes, big and small, on him.
jbarnaby Very well written,
Posted: Thu, 05/01/2008 - 17:29.
jbarnaby
Very well written, and I respect your position.
I agree with you that there is a clear disconnect between the ideology of J. Wright and Obama. I don’t believe that Obama feels the way Wright does on most of the issues in Wright’s widely publicized sermons. But to trying to defend Wright by saying we have only seen a small part of his 30 years of sermons is not fair. He himself has defended his comments, and for me, that is enough to know how he feels about this country. That being said; it has little to do with how I feel about Obama.
I also agree that Wright is from a different time; a time I will never be able to understand.
What I do know is that this country has made significant progress since that time, Obama is proof of that. These strides should be celebrated and built upon; not overlooked in order to revert back to the past in order to point fingers.
Unlike Sean Hannity, I don’t mind the fact that Wright’s Church is trying to lift up “his own” people. I do have a problem with the racist, mean, unconfirmed, bigoted, and blame-game tactics he uses.
I understand what Wright is trying to do; it’s his approach that offends me. It’s like those “Darwin fish” you see on cars used to promote evolution. Why do they have to attack a symbol of my faith, “Jesus Fish,” in order to promote theirs? Can’t they just state the facts with out hurting/offending others?
I would be very interested to hear your thoughts on my opinion.
Wright...
Posted: Thu, 05/01/2008 - 18:09.
First let me thank you for reading the blog and taking the time to comment. Maybe I wasn't clearer, but what I intended was to show a man who has turned against himself, not a defense of Mr. Wright. We are living in a time when two generations exist: a generation who fought for change and one who is benefiting from their efforts. Often times people get stuck in a time bubble and are unable to appreciate the strides that have been made. There is always more work to be done, a utopian society free of problems and faults an impossible end to reach, yet there must be an ability to reflect on what has worked and use that as a unifying force for future progress. For me I see Wright as having a crisis of identity compounded by 9/11, a point when he detached himself from reality and began a fight with himself. This is not an excuse by any means and I see these people as potentially dangerous is given the right audience, using former credibility for their own personal self satisfaction. I think we all know someone who fits this profile to some degree, changing radically to give themself a sense of self or living in a different time. If Barack Obama gets the nomination I believe he will be able to distance himself further and show the voters who he is and what he stands for as he has in his books and speeches so elequently, allowing for the real debate on issues to begin with McCain. A debate not predicated on associations with characters such as Hagee and Wright.
As to your comment about certain approaches ie "Darwin Fish". Sometimes people simply react, never thinking what this symbol or belief might mean to others, another example being the burning of the American Flag. While I don't believe it should be banned, I can't for the life of me think anyone would resort to such measures to make a point. It does little for their cause, making those who might agree with their views distance themselves. Sometimes I hear or see things I find offensive and I have to stop and take a moment and think who is this person or group. Often times the offense is not intention and when it is I believe the best course of action is a civil discussion. Usually is becomes evident whether the person just wasn't thinking or cold really care less. I hope we move as a country more towards a point where we can stand by our ideas while still recognizing the legitimate concerns of those who disagree.
Jason Barnaby
Jason Very well said, and I
Posted: Thu, 05/01/2008 - 18:38.
Jason
Very well said, and I could not agree with you more.
I look forward to reading more of your thoughts, not because I agree with your last statement, but because you have a mind-set that I find admirable.
Keep up the good work.